and in conformity with Law. The Governor adds that the Emigration to Surinam is not in the hands of M. Lobschied but in those of the Dutch Consul M. Basman – that the times (which he states) are very favorable and that the accounts from the Colony represent the people as prosperous.
I am not aware of any reason to doubt the representations which have been made to the Governor in respect to the people in Surinam : –
4. A considerable portion of Mr. Thomsett's export is, however, devoted to a contrast between Mr. Sampson's Emigration and the emigration from Hongkong – and to a proof that the latter is in practice the best conducted of the two. He accuses Mr. Sampson of misrepresentation, and somewhat suggests that he is himself the author of some of the articles in the "China Mail" attacking Hongkong emigration. I do not suppose that Mr. Thomsett means this seriously – it is rather an expression of his irritation at what he considers Mr. Sampson's unjust depreciatory remarks – but it is due to Mr. Sampson in the present instance to point out that in his letter which
6
and in conformity with Law. The Governor adds that the
Emipation to Surinam iend
langer
in the hands of th. Lobschied
M.
but in those of the Dutch Consul
MW. Basman.
-
that the time.
(which he states) are very favorable
and that the accounts from
the Colony represent the people
ae
prosperous.
Jam not aware
of any reason to doubt
the
representations which have been
made to the Governor in respect to the people in Surinam : –
4.
A considerable portion of Mr. Thomsetts' export is however,
devoted to a contrast between M.
}
729
Sampson's Emigration and the emigration from Hongkong- and
in
to a proof that the latter is practice the best conducted of the two . He accuses th. Sampson of
misrepresentation, and som
suggests that he is himself the author of some of the articles in the "China treail" attacking Hongkong
emigation. Edo not suppose
that ow. Thomsett means this
the
seriously - it is rather ofpepsing of his irritation at what he considers Mr. Sampson's unjust depreciatory remarks - but it is due to W. Sampson in the present instance to point out that in his letter which
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.